Navigating the division of assets and debts in a divorce in California can be nerve-wracking. With so much on the line, you need to be sure you have the knowledge necessary to come out with all you’re entitled to by law. This article serves as a primer, exploring:
- How property and assets are defined in California.
- The implications of California being a community property state for you.
- Factors that affect how assets are divided.
How Does California State Law Define Property In A Divorce Case?
In California, property in a divorce case is broadly defined as assets and liabilities that hold value or create financial obligations. Here’s a breakdown of the categories you’ll need to understand when working through the division of assets and debts in a divorce:
Assets
Assets encompass any property or item of value acquired during the marriage. In California, unless there are specific exceptions, assets acquired during the marriage are typically considered community property, meaning they belong equally to both spouses.
Debts And Liabilities
Debts and liabilities, such as mortgages, loans, credit card balances, and other financial obligations, are also part of the property division process. Like assets, debts accumulated during the marriage are generally considered community debts, and both spouses may be responsible for them, regardless of which spouse incurred the debt.
Is California A Joint Or Community Property State? What Does This Mean?
California is a community property state. In community property states like California, assets and debts acquired during the marriage are generally considered jointly owned by both spouses, regardless of which spouse earned the income or acquired the debt. This principle typically results in a 50-50 split of community property during divorce proceedings unless there are specific circumstances or legal exceptions that warrant a different division.
What Factors Affect How Property Or Assets Are Divided In A Divorce? Factors Such As Fault, The Length Of The Marriage, Etc.
In California divorce cases, several factors can influence how property or assets are divided. Here are some key considerations:
Source Of Funds
Determining the source of funds used to acquire an asset is extremely important when calculating how assets are to be divided. Assets acquired during the marriage using community funds are typically considered community property and thus subject to equal division. However, if separate funds are used to acquire an asset during the marriage, the contributing spouse may have a separate property interest in that asset.
Reimbursement Claims
When one spouse uses separate funds to improve community property or make significant contributions to community assets, they may be entitled to reimbursement for their separate property contributions.
Business Ownership And Growth
The division of business interests can be especially complex if the business was started or acquired before marriage but grew significantly during the marriage. In such cases, the community may have a claim to a portion of the increased value of the business attributable to the efforts and investments made during the marriage.
Length Of Marriage
The length of a marriage itself does not directly affect property division in California, but longer marriages often involve more intertwined financial assets and may lead to more complex property division issues.
Effort And Contribution
The contributions of each spouse during the marriage, both financially and non-financially, are considered. This includes factors such as income, career sacrifices, homemaking, child-rearing, and other contributions to the family’s well-being.
Agreements
Spouses can also reach agreements regarding the division of assets through prenuptial agreements or postnuptial agreements, which may override certain default community property rules.
Custodial Arrangements
Custodial arrangements for children can also impact property division, especially if one spouse is granted primary custody and needs a suitable living arrangement.
I’ll provide a few examples that illustrate this in an easy-to-understand way.
Let’s say you buy a house during your marriage and take it as joint ownership. The default is that the house is community property. However, let’s say your spouse took $500,000 out of an inheritance account they had from before marrying you to use toward the down payment. This means your spouse has a separate property interest in the house because of the down payment.
There are multiple ways this could be addressed. For one, there is a dollar-for-dollar exchange where your spouse would just get their money back (see reimbursement claim above). There is also the idea that she owns a portion of the house as separate property and is also entitled not only to that back, but the percentage of the equity as well.
Alternatively, let’s say you marry someone who is a doctor with a private practice that’s just getting off the ground. Fast forward about fifteen years, and the practice has grown dramatically, now with multiple surgery centers, etc. Your spouse has put every single hour of time and ounce of blood, sweat, and tears necessary and possible into making this happen. Because California is a community property state, it means any work done by either spouse during the marriage is considered community property, including your income and, by extension, work effort. In this example, you’d have earned community interest in that separate property business.
On the other hand, let’s suppose you marry someone whose father owns a joint medical practice with their other three children. Your spouse doesn’t work for the practice, and thus, the business didn’t grow from your spouse’s efforts. As a result, it is separate property that has grown from its own separate property funds. (Rental properties are often similarly debated in divorce proceedings.)
What Happens If I Own Property Like A House Before Getting Married And Put The Property Into A Joint Name During The Marriage?
By adding a spouse’s name to the title of a piece of property, it effectively transforms from separate property to community property. This means that both spouses now have an equal interest in the property, regardless of who initially owned it. As such, the spouse who originally owned the property may lose their initial interest in the home as separate property. In short, this means that the equity and ownership rights associated with the property prior to marriage will most likely no longer be solely attributed to that spouse.
Converting separate property into joint ownership can have significant implications, especially in the event of divorce or other legal proceedings. It effectively exposes the property to division during divorce proceedings, potentially resulting in the loss of the original owner’s premarital equity in the property.
In cases where one spouse contributed the property as separate property and later converted it to joint ownership, they may be in a position where they need to rely on the goodwill and fairness of the other spouse to receive a portion of the property’s equity in the event of divorce or separation.
Are Pensions Or Retirement-Program Assets Divided In The Same Way As Other Assets?
Dividing pensions or retirement program assets in divorce proceedings differs from other types of property division. Pensions, 401(k)s, and other retirement accounts require specialized knowledge to divide them properly in a divorce. While you don’t necessarily need to hire a specialized attorney, you may need to work with experts who understand the complexities involved.
Division of these assets depends on various factors such as the duration of employment, vesting periods, marriage duration, and contributions made during the marriage. Calculations are necessary to determine the portion belonging to each spouse.
In California, couples have flexibility in how they divide pension and retirement assets. They can either follow legal guidelines or come to agreements on their own terms. This might involve one spouse keeping their pension while the other retains their 401(k) or offsetting the value with other assets, for example.
If you cannot come to an agreement with your to-be ex-spouse, you’ll need to have one of a few specialized firms in California handle the case. This handful of firms handles about 95% of all pensions and 401Ks and is experienced in navigating the legal complexities involved and ensuring that the division is fair and equitable.
What Are Some Dangers Of Not Having An Experienced Family Law Attorney When Dealing With Division Of Assets In A Divorce?
Not having an experienced family law attorney by your side when dealing with dividing assets and property in a divorce can lead to several dangers. Without proper legal guidance, you risk losing money and assets that you are entitled to. An experienced attorney can help ensure that your rights are protected and that you receive a fair share of the marital property.
Family law matters involve countless complexities and exceptions you simply can’t foresee without having the experience of an attorney. Not being aware of all of the nuances and exceptions could significantly affect the outcome of your case.
But it’s not just important to hire any attorney; you need a skilled one. New family law attorneys may not have experienced a wide enough range of situations and scenarios to handle your case effectively. Experience plays a vital role in steering you through the complexities of divorce and property division in a way that positions you as best as possible.
For more information on Division Of Assets & Debts In A Divorce, an initial consultation is your next best step. Get the information and legal answers you are seeking by calling (888) 301-6777 today.
Call For A Free Consultation (888) 301-6777
